Just thinking loudly: 2/3 gender rule
Why affirmative
action? (Gosh its 2016 but we still ask). So why gender affirmative action?
That has been the debate in Kenya more so in the last three days with all sorts
of “social media” experts.
I had vowed not to engage on the 2/3 gender
rule debate in Kenya because some of ignorant comments are just too much for a
sane mind. When you have been working on these issues for many years sometimes
it is hard to just get why people don’t get it. And it is tiring. I will not go
to parliament let me go to the village. I will just give this example.
Some years back together with Hon Adelina Mwau and Nzungi we were working on some water project that would bring the much
needed water closer to the people. Note: In our culture who fetches water? Who
suffers when there is no water?
We were working with the project in that
community in consultation with the leaders. (By leaders I mean the current
leaders take precedence – chief, village elders, etc etc – read male). We made
it clear that there needed to be gender representation in the committees’
membership etc. Why? Because when the water committee or other committees are
formed in the village the heads of household (read men) represent the house
while women are left taking care of whatever else in the homestead. Be honest,
that is the norm, that is what we see every day. It is what is expected. It is
what is normal, respectable etc, etc. show me a home where the man will be left
in the house and woman goes to represent the household, the village gossip will
never end. (Kukaliwa chapatti.)
While we made the information clear of
course it was not easy to get this working in the community. So we had to
INSIST. Eventually some more names were
put in as members of committee. There were not many literate women to put in
committee. (*illiteracy- historical injustice). Also It
was time to visit the community for one of the many meetings and by then we
knew we are on the same page, there has to be females and males in the meeting.
It is over ten years ago but I still remember women sitting some place aside
and men “at the table”. Culturally acceptable. No worries.
We started discussing the issues around
this. A lot had been written on the processes of the project but we had to ‘interfere’
in seeking the opinions of women. I still recall some major discrepancies
between what was written and what women wanted. For one, men had under
estimated the amount of water required in the household hence even the amount
suggested for buying was not fair. I
recall women actually laughing like “what? That for clothes, dishes, drinking,
bathing, cow…”. To cut the long story
short, a lot of issues had been assumed, the men did not do this intentionally
in fact they very much wanted their women and girls to stop going for many
kilometres to look for water. Their heart was in the right place. But they did
not know. They did not details on what water is required in the house among
other ‘minor’ details that made a big difference in the project. If the consultation
with women had not happened the project would not have served the intended
population well enough. Many women and girls would still have left the project
to go to the river miles away.
So,
No: the playing field is not level for
women and men
No: women are no better leaders, individual
women and men are good or bad leaders
No: women need not be perfect, as we have
corrupt men in power we can have corrupt women in power, it does not make them
worse because they are women,
No: we should not have different standards
for measuring men and women’s achievements. I am just hearing “what have
nominated women done” and I am wondering “what have elected men done?” I don’t know. I don’t know what WOMEN HAVE
DONE, but I know what Hon. Denitah is doing, what Hon. Wangari is doing (need I mentioned
they are women??) among others.
No: women will never get equal vote despite
their efforts and capability in the current cultural setting, not in many years
to come.
Yes: it is hard enough for a woman to get a
leadership role in the village let alone in more public spaces.
YES
we need affirmative action. There are so many hurdles to women participating in
political leadership and capacity is not one of them.
Comments
Post a Comment